She had five children and cared for and loved us throughout her life - even in spite of some things she may not have approved of. We loved her back - in spite of some little things that didn't please us as we were growing up. As we grew in that love, life's little irritations faded away and became too few to mention.
Thursday, March 29
We miss you Mom
My mother died ten years today (March 30) in Lowell, MA. Anna Mary (Wynn) Archibald was born December 16, 1909.
Saturday, March 24
In memory of Trayvon Martin
I wear a hoodie on occasion but this is no reason to shoot me and it was no reason to fear or shoot a 17-year old African-American youth in Sanford, Fla. on February 26. The Grand Jury and/or the Justice Department need to get to the bottom of this.
Labels:
Ethics,
Family,
guns death,
Home,
Law,
Lifestyles
Tuesday, March 20
The art of talking...
"What
makes a good conversationalist has changed little over the years. The
basics remain the same as when Cicero became the first scholar to write
down some rules, which were summarised in 2006 by The Economist: 'Speak
clearly; speak easily but not too much, especially when others want
their turn; do not interrupt; be courteous; deal seriously with serious
matters and gracefully with lighter ones; never criticise people behind
their backs; stick to subjects of general interest; do not talk about
yourself; and, above all, never lose your temper.' But Cicero was lucky:
he never went on a first date with someone more interested in their
iPhone than his company." (Excerpted from "How to have a conversation," John McDermott, Financial Times -online, March 9, 2012.)
If you do not wish to
receive future blogs, e-mail
with the word REMOVE
in the subject. I apologize
if I have intruded.
Friday, March 16
A good friend has passed on...
Vivian G. Boyd, 96, of Hanahan, SC, has passed on. She was a good friend, always joyful, optimistic and showing concern for others. We often visited with her at church on Sunday and always left with a smile on our face. My late wife, Mary, and I were privileged to attend her 90th birthday party held in the Divine Redeemer Church hall and share a few laughs with her. She will be missed by family and her legions of friends.
Monday, March 12
You're nuts!
In 1917, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders listed 22 psychiatric diagnoses. This is the bible of the mental health profession and strives to catalog every form of mental illness known to man and woman. A new edition due out next year will list 350 diagnoses. Despite the vast accumulation of knowledge and insight gained over the last 95 years there is one constant: If you talk to God, you're praying. If God talks to you, you're nuts.
Saturday, March 10
What is happening in our world?
An article in the March issue of SmartMoney, a publication
of the Dow-Jones & Company, Inc., (publishers of The Wall Street Journal,)
detailed how in some families job hunting has become a total family affair.
Parents of college-grad children are writing resumes for them, tracking them a
couple of times a week on LinkedIn, going on job interviews, making follow-up
calls (because junior is too busy watching Jersey
Shore?). One new hire’s mother reportedly called to say her kid was
working too many hours and she wasn’t happy.
In some cases where the parents are no more successful in
helping the kid land a job than the kid is on his/her own, parents hire “job
coaches.”
Some of this is undoubtedly desperation on the part of
meddling, doting or desperate (or all three) parents: they want the kids out of
the house and on someone else’s payroll. Twenty-two or twenty-three years of
raising, feeding, nursing, clothing, hauling them to little league and ballet
classes, and educating them is enough. They want to see some payback for the
hundred and fifty grand they coughed up for some private college.
Nevertheless, it was an eye-opener to read some of the
lengths to which involved parents go in the 21st century to help
junior or missy get a job. And think nothing of it. How was it I
and others of my age missed out on this golden opportunity to meddle in our
children’s lives well into their adulthood? It is difficult to believe this sort of obsessive
parenting is only a logical evolution of life in America. Two hundred years ago
artisans took their sons into the family business or trade and taught them how to earn a
livelihood. In my adult experience, fathers and/or mothers – at the most, called
old friends and former college classmates to ask for a job interview for their
offspring. My parents did not do this for me, but I never held it against those
that did. Within my own family, a suggestion, a nod in the right direction, or
a discrete inquiry was to my mind enough.
About thirty years ago I suggested to my oldest son where he
might apply for a job. I gave him a book written by a man recounting his
experiences in that line of work. He read the book, applied for a job and a
career was born. Another son regretted he had declined a job. He had second
thoughts but was embarrassed to ask if the job was still available. I told him
to call."If the job is
still open, there is no embarrassment. If they tell you are too late, hang up.
It’s over.” He made the call, and got the job at an increased opening salary.
Another son wanted to change careers and I asked a
friend to give him an interview. He landed a job and today is a highly valued
employee. A firm where I had done a piece of business opened a new location. I
told them my daughter who was in the same industry wanted to relocate. “Tell
her to send a resume.” She did and relocated.
My last child wanted to go to graduate school to enhance her
opportunities. For a couple of years she and her son boarded in our family home
two days a week and my wife absolutely loved caring for the grandson while our daughter
went to school. Today she is doing well.
At the most I made two suggestions, had two short
conversations, and enjoyed the pleasure of watching my grandson grow.
Accompanying kids on
job interviews? Tracking them on LinkedIn? What has happened to our world? If
this madness continues parents will be going daily to the job while the over-educated
kids stay home and play the latest version of Nintendo?
Saturday, March 3
Electric shock for Limbaugh
Hardly anyone in the United States isn't aware of Rush Limbaugh's insult of a Georgetown law student for her testimony about insurance coverage for birth control pills. His ugly version is twisted 180 degrees opposite what the student testified about. Here is some information excerpted from The Loyal Opposition blog, The New York Times, March 2, 2012:
"Do the Right Thing
"By ANDREW ROSENTHAL
"Intolerance
and character assassination are so ubiquitous in political discourse
that it’s important to take note when someone calls out bad behavior,
withstands it, or bothers to apologize for it.
*****
"The next person who deserves a bit of positive attention is Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student.
"At a Congressional hearing in mid-February on the Obama administration’s new contraception rules, Ms. Fluke testified that birth control can cost women up to $3,000 over the course of law school. She also told the House Oversight Committee about a friend who was prescribed birth control pills as part of her cancer treatment (a common occurrence) but had to buy them herself because Georgetown’s health insurance did not cover it (also a common occurrence).
"She was eminently reasonable. But, this week, Rush Limbaugh attacked her repeatedly on his radio show. He twisted what Ms. Fluke said beyond recognition and claimed she was trying to get taxpayers to subsidize her sex life, which is entirely irrelevant to this conversation. Mr. Limbaugh called her a “slut” who wanted to be paid to have sex.
"(After he heard about Mr. Limbaugh’s comments, Mr. Obama called Ms. Fluke to thank her for backing his policies despite the onslaught, and to see how she was doing. I think he deserves praise, but he’s not one of the three because the effort cost him no political capital.)"
Earlier this week I expressed the idea of starting a fund to take Rush Limbaugh out for an afternoon of electric shock. Learning more details of how he twisted Ms. Fluke's testimony leads me to think a full day might be in order.
*****
"The next person who deserves a bit of positive attention is Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student.
"At a Congressional hearing in mid-February on the Obama administration’s new contraception rules, Ms. Fluke testified that birth control can cost women up to $3,000 over the course of law school. She also told the House Oversight Committee about a friend who was prescribed birth control pills as part of her cancer treatment (a common occurrence) but had to buy them herself because Georgetown’s health insurance did not cover it (also a common occurrence).
"She was eminently reasonable. But, this week, Rush Limbaugh attacked her repeatedly on his radio show. He twisted what Ms. Fluke said beyond recognition and claimed she was trying to get taxpayers to subsidize her sex life, which is entirely irrelevant to this conversation. Mr. Limbaugh called her a “slut” who wanted to be paid to have sex.
"(After he heard about Mr. Limbaugh’s comments, Mr. Obama called Ms. Fluke to thank her for backing his policies despite the onslaught, and to see how she was doing. I think he deserves praise, but he’s not one of the three because the effort cost him no political capital.)"
Earlier this week I expressed the idea of starting a fund to take Rush Limbaugh out for an afternoon of electric shock. Learning more details of how he twisted Ms. Fluke's testimony leads me to think a full day might be in order.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)